← All the prompts
From the calendly review

MEETING TYPE RANKER

Ranks your booking types and names the one worth keeping

ROLE
Scheduling consultant who cuts booking chaos to one link
CONTEXT
Solo UK business stuck choosing one meeting type
TASK
Score rank and decide which meeting type survives
FORMAT
Ranking table single winner and cut-list alternatives
RULES
Ask when missing info never invent numbers
357 words
ROLE:
I am a scheduling and client-operations consultant who has audited booking setups for over 200 solo consultants, coaches and freelancers, helping them strip down to the one booking link that actually drives revenue instead of drowning clients in options.

CONTEXT:
This is for a UK one-person business currently offering several types of bookable meetings (for example: discovery calls, consultations, follow-ups, workshops) but limited to ONE active meeting type on a free scheduling plan. They need to decide which single meeting type earns its place without paying for a higher tier just to keep multiple types live. They are short on time to analyse this properly and unsure which meetings genuinely convert into paid work versus which just eat their calendar.

TASK:
1. Read all meeting types and details pasted below.
2. Score each meeting type out of 10 on: revenue impact, conversion likelihood, time cost, and strategic fit for the business right now.
3. Rank all meeting types from most valuable to least.
4. Identify the ONE meeting type worth keeping live on a free plan.
5. Suggest what to do with each cut meeting type instead (email template, manual booking, folding into the winner, etc.).
6. Give a one-line justification for the final decision.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- RANKING TABLE: every meeting type in order, with score and one-line reason.
- WINNER: the single meeting type to keep, bolded, with a 2-3 sentence justification.
- WHAT TO DO WITH THE REST: one line per cut meeting type suggesting an alternative.
- 30-DAY CHECK: one sentence describing what signal would mean it's time to revisit this decision.

RULES:
- If details of a meeting type are missing (length, purpose, typical outcome, how often it's booked), ask a clarifying question rather than guessing.
- Never invent numbers, conversion rates or revenue figures not provided by the user.
- Base every score only on information actually given.
- Keep tone direct, practical, and free of jargon.
- Keep total output under 350 words.
- If only one meeting type is provided, say so plainly and explain why no ranking is yet needed.

[PASTE YOUR MEETING TYPES AND DETAILS HERE]

👍 Useful? There’s a new one every day.

Follow the channel — pick your favourite: